He spoke for nearly eight minutes, and in that entire time, he never spoke about the fact that he knew it was coming. That he had worked to provoke Japan into making a "mistake" for the past fourteen months. That the knowledge had been withheld from Admiral Husband E. Kimmel and General Walter Short. These men lived their lives in shame thereafter and fought until death to clear themselves.
In October of 2000, "during the presidency of Bill Clinton" he "signed into law, with the support of a bipartisan Congress, the National Defense Authorization Act that, among other provisions, reversed the findings of nine previous Pearl Harbor investigations and found that both Kimmel and Short were denied the crucial intelligence."
This was due to their families relentless fight to clear their fathers names. Many of those in Congress who wrote into the National Defense, clearing their names, read a book written by Robert Stinnett.
That book is Day of Deceit which details these facts.
FDR wanted badly into the WWII to supposedly fight the Germans, but that filthy Commie Bastard, who swore constantly in his fireside chats that "Eleanor don't war, my boys don't want war- there will be no war."
FDR lied.
My Father served in that war, and others that came after it, but he is the one who taught me the truth about FDR before such news was commonly understood. He is the one who lived through the Great Depression and heard that Commie-Bastard not only say such, he also saw his policies of forcing the farmers into town and mocked that butcher FDR accordingly.
My existence is due to that war, but this does not negate the fact that I say the attack on Pearl Harbor should not have happened and could have been averted.
Many people fought to keep us out of WWII, and then, as today, are scorned as Isolationist and Non-Interventionists at best and cowards at worst- they were not. They were people who saw much truth in the waste that would come and when it did, stood and fought.
Give up not one Liberty, not one Freedom, not one more inch given to these government liars whose goal is to turn us into serfs! More such feel-good propaganda will be occurring much more regularly to sway opinions, minds, and emotions to create the scream for security- I say no and be prepared to fight!
What is coming will make the Great Depression look like a walk in the park I firmly think and a friend often says: "I for one look forward to the coming pandemonium- debts will be paid."
Most people hear that and think what does he think he is entitled to? I heard him answer once when asked and he simply said, "What is promised to me as an American in the Constitution and Bill of Rights. I swore an oath to those contracts and contracts flow two ways- not one."
Funny thing is he never says what currency he is willing to accept but I do have a good idea what his is. What will be yours?
Not that--hell, we expected that. Still to be determined: How many deaths have happened/will still happen on THIS side of the border, as if we'll ever know.
The shocker is ABC News is reporting on it.
The thing is nearly every blog I link to has been asking this for 5+ months in relation to Gunwalker and it is asked nearly everyday- on someones blog. I stated and asked this just last week in my post "...Descent Into Fascism...":
You cannot wash their blood away and what consistently comes to mind is: How many American Citizens names do we NOT know and just HOW MUCH blood is on YOUR HANDS? Not just because of Gunwalker, but because of EVERY un-Constitutional Act you approved, let stand, or enforced! Not just judges, but bureaucrats, police and elected politicians (local, state, federal).
The MSM is slowly waking up, slowly asking questions, but not MOST of them. Most of them are working to protect the murdering vermin of The Swamp- their jobs depend on it, but the local stations do not. This does not mean that they are not as corrupt or corruptible as the MSM but you do not have a better forum than your local press to get the story out and then onto the Internet. Pressure builds and builds. It has been just over six-months since the story broke on the Web thanks to Mike Vanderboegh and David Codrea with the help of those men at CleanUPATF.org and there are Congressional Hearings and Senate Investigations!
Not those authorized- CITIZEN JOURNALISTS DID THIS!
Get out and do your part (call, write, hound, tell everyone you know), many already have and many continue to do so. Work to see these Murderous Scum receive justice, but not just on Gunwalker- if you do not, IMO, you are tacitly guilty for standing by and doing nothing (whether Burke said it or not- it still stands as a truth).
Many might decide that this is: "Just so many words below!" That reading may hurt your eyes, you brain, or you do not have the time and if so- your World, not mine.
The following interview covers two important things- the purse and the sword and what as well as how the Fascists of The Swamp have and are doing.
Of those reading this, most know this, most are concerned, most will do nothing and some are actually working towards the goals defined in the interview. But then, there are those that have known this for a long time, are more than concerned, and are doing things about this so for those that will do nothing, step up now because those working towards these goals are afraid of you. Why else do you think such laws are passed to allow these murders to happen? The interview is not that long and the complete interview can be read at the link. All text in BOLD & ITALICS were done by me.
The U.S. Monetary System And Descent Into Fascism An Interview With Dr. Edwin Vieira
The following interview with Dr. Vieira was conducted in early June of 2011 for the subscribers of The Casey Report – but after careful consideration, we decided that the content is so important; it needs to be shared with a wider audience. Feel free to pass it along.
David Galland
Managing Editor
The Casey Report
For more than thirty years, Edwin Vieira, Jr., has practiced law, with emphasis on constitutional issues. In the Supreme Court of the United States, he successfully argued or briefed the cases leading to the landmark decisions Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, Chicago Teachers Union v. Hudson, and Communications Workers of America v. Beck, which established constitutional and statutory limitations on the uses to which labor unions, in both the private and the public sectors, may apply fees extracted from nonunion workers as a condition of their employment.
He has written numerous monographs and articles in scholarly journals, and lectured throughout the county. His most recent work on money and banking is the two-volume Pieces of Eight: The Monetary Powers and Disabilities of the United States Constitution (2002), the most comprehensive study in existence of American monetary law and history viewed from a constitutional perspective.
He is also the co-author (under a nom de plume) of the political novel CRA$HMAKER: A Federal Affaire (2000), a not-so-fictional story of an engineered crash of the Federal Reserve System, and the political upheaval it causes.
His latest book is: How to Dethrone the Imperial Judiciary... and Constitutional "Homeland Security," Volume One, The Nation in Arms.
We first met Dr. Vieira at our Casey Research Boca Raton Summit and were sufficiently impressed to want to hear more, and to share more, of his work with readers of The Casey Report.
We first met Dr. Vieira at our Casey Research Boca Raton Summit and were sufficiently impressed to want to hear more, and to share more, of his work with readers of The Casey Report.
DAVID: Before kicking things off, I'd refer readers to Dr. Vieira's in-depth and excellent paper, "A Cross of Gold," as that provides a more detailed analysis on how the corrupt U.S. monetary system might transition into something more honest and effective.
Getting started, from a big-picture perspective, technically speaking, is the current U.S. monetary system actually constitutional?
EDWIN: Well, technically speaking, factually speaking, legally speaking, no. In a word, no.
DAVID: Why not?
EDWIN: There are two levels to consider. First, there's the straight currency level – what is supposed to be the official monetary unit. Then there is "other," which I distinguish as different from the official monetary unit because the Constitution doesn't prohibit private parties from creating media of exchange for their own uses, as long as those media of exchange are non-fraudulent and they're operated in an otherwise honest commercial fashion.
But the official unit of currency is supposed to be the dollar, and I'll tell you exactly what a dollar is – it's 371.25 grains of silver in the form of a coin. That was determined as a historical fact in 1792. Actually the dollar was adopted before the Constitution was even written. It was adopted by the Continental Congress under the Articles of Confederation, the so-called Spanish milled dollar, which was the actual unit that was circulating then, because there had been essentially no coinage under the various colonial regimes in colonial America. So that's the dollar unit.
AND
EDWIN: And yet they allow for it. Now, either this is the biggest bunch of idiots that has ever been assembled in judicial robes in the history of humanity, or there's some other agenda going on here.
DAVID: Assuming that they are not complete idiots, what could that other agenda be?
EDWIN: In my view, and I've written about this for years, the people at the top levels of government understand that their monetary system is inherently flawed. That we're on the Titanic, in a sense, and they know that this ship is going to sink. They don't know when, but they know when it sinks, they're going to have a huge amount of economic dislocation, social crisis and civil unrest to the level of revolt.
So they started developing this police state mechanism in the hopes of keeping the lid on the garbage can when the monetary system breaks down. The upper echelons of the judiciary have been going right along with this because they know what the program is. This is obvious. No one in his right mind would stand by and allow the sort of excesses we’ve seen.
Just the other day, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment doesn't apply at all because you can sue the police after they've mistakenly broken into your home. But when they break into your home and they kill you, then what?
DAVID: Not a lot of recourse then.
EDWIN: Right, like that poor ex-marine that was shot 60 times in Arizona, and he's dead – now what, can he bring a lawsuit? Have we lost our minds? I mean, you don't have to be a Harvard-educated lawyer to know that this is insanity. This does not rise to the level of just mere error. No one in his right mind can write these kinds of opinions, which means that either they're insane, which I don't believe, or they have another agenda, and the judicial opinions are simply camouflage – they're propaganda to convince us that "Oh well, this is all right" because Judge Flapdoddle told us that it's all right.
Judge Flapdoddle- everyone knows these liars because we all have them. Lying filthy scum hiding behind what most consider an exalted black robe. They are just men who, like the rest believe themselves "Only Ones", who allow citizens to be "Whacked & Stacked" which is a mockery and brought us to "Injustice Everywhere". For those that doubt this, I remind you of "Project Gunwalker" wherein the plan to "walk" guns into Mexico was actually a cover to further eviscerate the 2nd Amendment and now, those that planned, approved, and watched have the blood of not just Mexicans, but Americans- Border Patrol Brian Terry and Ice Special Agent Jaime Zapata.
You cannot wash their blood away and what consistently comes to mind is: How many American Citizens names do we NOT know and just HOW MUCH blood is on YOUR HANDS? Not just because of Gunwalker, but because of EVERY un-Constitutional Act you approved, let stand, or enforced! Not just judges, but bureaucrats, police and elected politicians (local, state, federal).
You use the purse to destroy, just like your Economic Wacos that you love, but ATF is not the only that uses them and if you cannot steal them when people are alive- you go in and kill them.
Ugliness is coming- everyone sees this and you know that it will be worse than the last time the Republic turned it's anger inwards.
The Federal Trade Commission recently appointed a British government agent to a senior management position, raising serious concerns about the FTC's commitment to US sovereignty and the increasing role of unelected foreign antitrust regulators in restricting the property rights and economic liberties of American citizens.
On June 22, the FTC named Dr. Alison Oldale as deputy director for antitrust in the agency's Bureau of Economics. Dr. Oldale, who is not a US citizen, is currently the chief economist for the United Kingdom's Competition Commission (UKCC). According to a UKCC press release, Dr. Oldale will be "on a year's secondment" – in effect, on loan to the FTC – and she is expected to return to UKCC after completing her service in the US. The FTC's press release on Dr. Oldale's appointment did not disclose this.
Dr. Oldale joined the UKCC in 2009 after working as a director at LECG Corporation, an international consulting firm that provided expert testimony in antitrust litigation. LECG employees were frequent participants in FTC policy workshops, and David Scheffman, a former LECG director, served twice as director of the FTC's Bureau of Economics. LECG ceased operations earlier this year.
They point out and verify what has been known for quite sometime- the BP stuck Agent Brian Terry with beanbag rounds to face down the threats on the border.
That talk show host, Sergio Sanchez is on the ball! He booked David Codrea at 08:00 CST tomorrow morning to talk "Gunwalker". Good on both of them. You can listen live on the radio if you are down there along the Rio or via their stream here and clicking Listen Live!
HEY! The rest of the media in Texas and along the border- WAKE UP! I am tired of the Muslim Kenyan and his minions blaming us for Mexico's problems and the ATF's "Killer Management". Tell us again how long you let Phoenix's "Project Gunwalker" go on?
And you expect us to believe you about the recent "bust" in Dallas?
I was just told that the morning talk show host on 710 KURV, which is in McAllen, Texas (the lower RGV), specifically told his listeners to Google "Project Gunwalker". Very good to hear, now lets see if the media folks in the rest of Texas, and specifically the along the border areas, will do so as well.
But the agents who objected within their own agency were repeatedly rebuffed, they were told to keep their mouths shut, to stop complaining about it, in one case we have an internal email that describes a supervisor telling somebody 'If you don't like it you can go work for the Maricopa County Jail—if this isnt fun to you then you can go find something else to do.'
Spread the news far and wide as those elected need to understand that what they are finally doing is the right and proper thing. Do not let up and do not forget to call and thank them as such a simple thing goes a long way.
Kurt Hofmann
St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner
February 10th, 2011 11:15 am CT
It should surprise no one that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE), and that agency's parent bureaucracy, the Department of Justice, are hoping to wriggle out from under the dark cloud (hurricane?) of scandal that is "Project Gunwalker."
When you read the article, you will see an excellent question raised indeed!
George Mason argued the importance of the militia and right to bear arms by reminding his compatriots of England's efforts "to disarm the people; that it was the best and most effectual way to enslave them . . . by totally disusing and neglecting the militia." He also clarified that under prevailing practice the militia included all people, rich and poor. "Who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers." Because all were members of the militia, all enjoyed the right to individually bear arms to serve therein.
The framers thought the personal right to bear arms to be a paramount right by which other rights could be protected. Therefore, writing after the ratification of the Constitution, but before the election of the first Congress, James Monroe included "the right to keep and bear arms" in a list of basic "human rights" which he proposed to be added to the Constitution.
Patrick Henry, also in the Virginia convention, eloquently argued for the dual rights to arms and resistance to oppression: "Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined." Thus, they agreed that an armed populace was the ultimate check on tyranny.
However, it is also about the simple enjoyment of honing a skill, friendship, fellowship, food, defense and family.
I could post more links, in fact link after link after link to further support this but you can research it yourself- do not believe me, LEARN!
Just understand that this truth terrifies so many- especially those elected who desperately want the 2nd INFRINGED, but this is but a part of the price of our Liberties; the risk that such can happen as is happening with each ticking minute.
This point cannot be expressed strongly enough- the 2nd Amendment is a Right. Rights are not granted by Man or governments- but are yours at conception (as Nature and Natures God intended) the basic Right to self-defense. As of today, the best tools to do this are firearms, along with the supporting accessories for them (which include the various types of ammunition and even the magazines that hold such), irrespective of the advancement since the 2nd was penned to parchment, and cannot be done away with- simply INFRINGED or ABRIDGED.
"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined."
NONE of us really wants to ever have to use it for hunting such and nor am I advocating doing such now; nevertheless, the primary purpose IS to remind those elected, and those wishing to enslave the populace (not all are elected- just supported by your stolen productivity), that the People fully retain the right to hunt tyrants down- permanently.
the police—oathbreakers all—in Arlington, MA, who have conspired in violation of the First and Second Amendments and 18 USC 241 - 242 to deny one Travis Corcoran the free exercise of his constitutionally-protected civil rights.
Travis is known as TJIC on his blog (now offline). Goons came and took his guns and ammo and his Massachusetts 'gun license', as they trampled on the Constitution, some Amendments, Federal Law, and common sense.
Hit the link and the links within his post- I am TJIC.
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 01/14/2011 12:23 -0500
From the McCrudden complaint, which cites a letter sent by the Alnbri CEO to a CFTC lawyer T.M.: "You can tell that fucking corrupt piece of Goldman Sachs shit [G.G.] I am coming after him as well. Oh, and your "ban"... shove them up your fucking ass you corrupt mother fucker....Make sure you all show up with [T.M.] and that fucking corrupt fucking midget [G.G.] when you serve me papers. I have something ready for you all." It appears that Vincent sure was passionate about his beliefs... And certainly not a fan of Gary Gensler.
Hmm, reading the comments I think chet is on to something.
You see, if you're going to kill some motherfuckers, it's important to not broadcast your intention to kill said motherfuckers, because such motherfuckers as you have identified will likley go to the corrupt motherfucking authorities before you can pop a cap in them.
Can one LOL or even ROTFLMFAO at, for instance, the following line:
"that fucking corrupt fucking midget"
and not be hauled off to prison?
However, the following is the best and truest comment in the thread:
by MagicHandPuppet
on Fri, 01/14/2011 - 13:35 #876758
Dear Slaves,
Expressing your anger publicly is forbidden. Please note that while your owners are performing "acts of god" by raping you, lube is a privilege and NOT a right. Our Ministry of Lube is experiencing an attack by foreign speculators and we are addressing this problem with diligence. Until our lube shortage is addressed, we appreciate your patience and understanding.
Please have a blessed day,
Management
Hit the link, read the indictment and make up your own mind.
He spoke for nearly eight minutes, and in that entire time, he never spoke about the fact that he knew it was coming. That he had worked to provoke Japan into making a "mistake" for the past fourteen months. That the knowledge had been withheld from Admiral Husband E. Kimmel and General Walter Short. These men lived their lives in shame thereafter and fought until death to clear themselves.
In October of 2000, "during the presidency of Bill Clinton" he "signed into law, with the support of a bipartisan Congress, the National Defense Authorization Act that, among other provisions, reversed the findings of nine previous Pearl Harbor investigations and found that both Kimmel and Short were denied the crucial intelligence."
This was due to their families relentless fight to clear their fathers names. Many of those in Congress who wrote into the National Defense, clearing their names, read a book written by Robert Stinnett.
That book is Day of Deceit which details these facts.
FDR wanted in badly into the WWII to supposedly fight the Germans, but that filthy Commie Bastard, who swore constantly in his fireside chats that "Eleanor don't war, my boys don't want war- there will be no war."
However- FDR lied.
My Father served in that war, and others that came after it, but he is the one who taught me the truth about FDR before such news was commonly understood. He is the one who lived through the Great Depression and heard that Commie-Bastard say such and mocked that butcher FDR accordingly.
My existence is due to that war, but this does not negate the fact that I say the attack on Pearl Harbor should not have happened and could have been averted.
Many people fought to keep us out of WWII, and then, as today, are scorned as Isolationist and Non-Interventionists at best and cowards at worst- they were not. They were people who saw much truth in the waste that would come and when it did, stood and fought.
Many similar things have been happening today and we are being told that our Liberties need to be curtailed for our safety and protection.
BULLSHIT!
Give up not one Liberty, not one Freedom, not one more inch given to these government liars whose goal is to turn us into serfs! More such feel-good propaganda will be occurring much more regularly to sway opinions, minds, and emotions to create the scream for security- I say no and be prepared to fight!
by J. in the Great White North
By James Wesley, Rawles on November 14, 2010 10:46 AM
Part 1 Introduction
The Inspiration for the first twenty years of my life, I believed not only that killing in self-defense was morally permissible but also that such defense was appropriate insofar as it was just. St. Augustine’s treatise On Free Choice of the Will, however, challenged my views on self-defense. In that work, Augustine and his interlocutor, Evodius, question “whether an attacking enemy or an ambushing murderer can be killed without any inordinate desire, for the sake of preserving one’s life, liberty, or chastity.” 1 After the two discuss the moral issues involved in the act of killing in self-defense, Evodius, though admitting that no human law condemns an individual for defending himself, asserts the following regarding attackers: I don’t blame the law that allows such people to be killed; but I can’t think of any way to defend those who do the killing. . . . I suspect that they are condemned by a more powerful, hidden law, if indeed there is nothing that is not governed by divine providence. How can they be free of sin in the eyes of the law, when they are defiled with human blood for the sake of things that ought to be held in contempt? 2 Although Evodius recognizes the practicality of a law permitting individuals to kill in self-defense, he argues that it is impossible to take such action without violating God’s law. Immediately, Evodius’ argument made me wonder whether or not I fully understood the act of killing in self-defense. The more time I spent considering the topic, the more strongly I felt that the morality of such action was much more complex than I had originally imagined. Although most everyone I knew held that it was permissible for individuals to kill in self-defense, I doubted that they had ever seriously considered the question. Consequently, I took it upon myself to delve deeper into the issue. The Project My investigation is directed at understanding the morality of killing in self-defense from a Christian perspective. I examined the works of numerous Christian authors and a broad range of perspectives, including those of St. Thomas Aquinas, St. Augustine, Stanley Hauerwas, Reinhold Niebuhr, Paul Ramsey, Leo Tolstoy, and John Howard Yoder. Although each of these authors affected the way I understood the morality of killing in self-defense, I limit the following discussion to three authors, Aquinas, Augustine, and Ramsey, whose works address the issue at hand with particular clarity.
I have no such qualms as I was taught early on that the choice is irrevocable and my thoughts can be summed up in this shortened philosophical example starting at 09:10 and goes to 09:50.
Read the blog and draw your own conclusion.
Hit the My Web Page link, at the top left, in "VIEW MY COMPLETE PROFILE" if you question the choice of the word "Whose"- for it was chosen specifically.
Posts
