TC Hamm asks, WTF!?!

WTF!?!

Project Gunrunner

ATF announced a goal to deploy eTrace software to all thirty-one states within the Republic of Mexico. As part of eTrace expansion, ATF continues to provide training to Mexican and Central American countries to ensure that the technology is utilized to a greater extent.[3] Colombia and Mexico were provided with their own in-country tracing centers with full access to ATF firearm registration records. In Colombia, a joint ATF-CNP Center for Anti-Explosives Information and Firearms Tracing (CIARA) opened on December 6, 2006.[4] In Mexico, The National Center for Information, Analysis and Planning in order to Fight Crime (CENAPI) was established in 2003. ATF states these are models for planned future tracing centers throughout Central and South America and the Caribbean Basin.[5] In December, 2009, ATF announced deployment of a Spanish version of eTrace to Mexico, Guatemala and Costa Rica. A planned second phase will release the software to all Spanish-speaking countries with agreements with ATF. In June 2011 congress opened an investigation into project gunrunner against the ATF, as some ATF agents have come forward stating that top heads in ATFE and the Department of Justice instructed the agents to encourage gun stores in the U.S. to sell assault-style weapons to Mexican firearm traffickers.

Participants

Along with a number of Caribbean police forces, many countries are formally provided with eTrace software with access to American gun owner names, addresses and personal information, including: [6]

• Mexico
• Colombia
• Suriname
• Tobago
• Guyana
• Canada
• Germany
• Bahamas
• Jamaica
• Dominican Republic
• Barbados
• Anguilla
• Antigua
• Barbuda
• Aruba
• Curacao
• Dominica
• Grenada
• St Vincent
• Grenadines
• St. Lucia
• Belize
• Costa Rica
• El Salvador
• Guatemala
• Panama
• St. Kitts
• Nevis
• Britain
• Australia
• Japan
• Belgium

I do think others have brought this up before, but I want to know, are you feeling safer now?

WP

Bilderbergers Searching blogs on Jayantha Dhanapala?

Found a curious entry in the stats this afternoon and considering the origin location, (Switzerland), the time frame (Bilderberg's are meeting in St. Moritz), and the fact that each link in my post about the UN Agreement was accessed- and am wondering.



I am sure those slimy bastards tasked someone to look and at the time, my entry was sixth and has now slipped to eleventh so let's see if this raises my blog back to the top ten so people can see what an ugly bastard Jayantha Dhanapala is so forward this link far and wide.



Now for those that want to get a better look at the Bilderberg slime, then go here.

WP

U.N. Agreement Should Have All Gun Owners Up In Arms

We told you foreign jackass thugs when we sent you the flag ten years ago! If you rat-bastards have forgotten, I will remind you of this post of October 4, 2004 that was posted in honor of Texas' Come and Take It Day relating the story of our stated intentions.

Three years ago, when the U.N. had the Conference on Small Arms (UN killed it- here is The Web Archive list), several of us here in Texas decided to send them a gift.



It was sent to this ugly bastard:



You can find more on this bs here (THESE ARE STILL OCCURRING).

This is the thread that got the flag rolling. My friend was very pissed at Mr. Jayantha Dhanapala's comments, and here is the thread on the gift flag.

Oh, and we never received a "Thank You" note from them...

--WP

So you go right ahead, UN and Swamp Monsters, do it; but understand this, come for them yourselves you cowards- as this time, we ain't going to be so nice.

WP

Janet Reno tell the truth?

Not according to Dick Morris.



A hat-tip to someone who prefers to remain anonymous.

WP

The border for dummies

The border for dummies

National Post
Published: Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Can someone please tell us how U. S. Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano got her job? She appears to be about as knowledgeable about border issues as a late-night radio call-in yahoo.

In an interview broadcast Monday on the CBC, Ms. Napolitano attempted to justify her call for stricter border security on the premise that "suspected or known terrorists" have entered the U. S. across the Canadian border, including the perpetrators of the 9/11 attack.

All the 9/11 terrorists, of course, entered the United States directly from overseas. The notion that some arrived via Canada is a myth that briefly popped up in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, and was then quickly debunked.

Informed of her error, Ms. Napolitano blustered: "I can't talk to that. I can talk about the future. And here's the future. The future is we have borders."

Just what does that mean, exactly?

Dear National Post (since there is no By-Line),

We in the united States would like an honest answer to both your questions but do not think we will ever receive honest answers.

However, I will try to answer, as many of us firmly think she was hired by the Kenyan Muslim because of the following:

• She is a Democrat
• She is a Woman
• She seemingly hates Herself
• She seemingly hates the united States
• She seemingly hates our shared English history and Culture

As for what it means, many of us firmly think she & the Kenyan Muslim are attempting to mitigate the facts that:

• Mexico wants our borders erased
• Mexico wants the Southern US because we kicked it's ass and then paid for the land
• Mexican MIGRATION, not IMMIGRATION is part of the plan to do so
• She seemingly hates Herself
• She seemingly hates the united States
• She seemingly hates our shared English history and Culture

I hope this helps clear things up.

WP